6.2 Refutation of Idealism (Moore, Russell, and Early Wittgenstein)
I. Introduction
1. Overview of Idealism
- Idealism is a philosophical theory that ideas are the only reality
- Impracticality by virtue of thinking of things in their ideal form rather than as they really are
- Elevated ideals or conduct; the quality of believing that ideals should be pursued
2. The Philosophical Context: Moore, Russell, and Early Wittgenstein
- G.E. Moore, Bertrand Russell, and Ludwig Wittgenstein were prominent philosophers in the early 20th century
- They were part of the analytic philosophy movement, which emphasized clarity, precision, and logical analysis
- Their works focused on refuting idealism and defending commonsense realism
3. The Defence of Commonsense: A Recap
- Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein argued for the existence of an external world independent of our perceptions
- They emphasized the importance of language and logic in understanding the world
- Their arguments laid the groundwork for later developments in analytic philosophy, including logical positivism and ordinary language philosophy
II. Moore’s Refutation of Idealism
1. Moore’s Realism
- G.E. Moore was an English philosopher and a prominent figure in the early 20th-century analytic philosophy movement
- He was a strong advocate for commonsense realism, which asserts that the external world exists independently of our perceptions
- Moore’s realism was a direct response to idealism, which claims that reality is fundamentally mental or spiritual in nature
- He believed that the existence of external objects could be proven through direct experience and common sense
2. The Nature of Sense-Data
- Sense-data are the immediate objects of perception, such as colors, shapes, and sounds
- Moore argued that sense-data are distinct from the external objects they represent
- He maintained that sense-data are mind-dependent, but they correspond to mind-independent external objects
- This view contrasts with idealism, which holds that sense-data are the only reality and that external objects are merely mental constructs
3. The Refutation of Idealism: External Objects and Sense-Data
- Moore’s refutation of idealism is based on his distinction between sense-data and external objects
- He argued that we can directly perceive external objects through our sense-data, and that this perception provides evidence for the existence of an external world
- Moore’s famous “here is a hand” argument is an example of this approach: by holding up his hand, he claimed to provide direct evidence for the existence of an external object (his hand) and, by extension, the external world
- This argument is an example of commonsense realism, as it relies on everyday experience and common sense to establish the existence of external objects
4. Criticisms of Moore’s Refutation
- Some critics argue that Moore’s refutation of idealism is circular, as it assumes the existence of external objects in order to prove their existence
- Others claim that Moore’s distinction between sense-data and external objects is problematic, as it implies a dualism between the mental and the physical that is difficult to reconcile
- Additionally, some philosophers argue that Moore’s commonsense approach is insufficient to establish the existence of an external world, as it relies on intuitive judgments that may be unreliable or biased
Despite these criticisms, Moore’s refutation of idealism remains an influential and important contribution to the debate between realism and idealism in philosophy. His emphasis on commonsense realism and the distinction between sense-data and external objects has had a lasting impact on the development of analytic philosophy and the study of perception.
III. Russell’s Refutation of Idealism
1. Russell’s Logical Atomism
- Bertrand Russell was a British philosopher, logician, and mathematician who played a significant role in the development of analytic philosophy
- Russell’s philosophical approach, known as logical atomism, aimed to provide a rigorous logical framework for understanding the world
- Logical atomism posits that the world is composed of simple, indivisible elements (atoms) and that language can accurately represent these elements through its logical structure
- Russell’s logical atomism was a direct response to idealism, as it emphasized the objective, mind-independent nature of the world and the capacity of language to represent it accurately
2. The Theory of Descriptions
- One of Russell’s key contributions to the philosophy of language is the theory of descriptions, which provides a logical analysis of the way language refers to objects
- The theory of descriptions helps to clarify the relationship between language and the external world, as it shows how sentences can refer to objects without assuming their existence
- This approach allows Russell to argue for the existence of unperceived objects, as it demonstrates that language can meaningfully refer to objects even if they are not directly perceived
3. The Existence of Unperceived Objects
- Russell’s refutation of idealism is based on his logical atomism and the theory of descriptions, which together provide a framework for understanding the existence of unperceived objects
- By showing that language can meaningfully refer to objects without assuming their existence, Russell challenges the idealist claim that reality is fundamentally mental or spiritual in nature
- Russell’s argument for the existence of unperceived objects supports the view that there is an external world independent of our perceptions and thoughts, which is a key tenet of realism
4. Criticisms of Russell’s Refutation
- Some critics argue that Russell’s refutation of idealism is circular, as it assumes the existence of external objects in order to prove their existence
- Others claim that Russell’s logical atomism and theory of descriptions are overly simplistic, as they fail to account for the complexity and diversity of human language and thought
- Additionally, some philosophers argue that Russell’s emphasis on the existence of unperceived objects does not necessarily refute idealism, as it leaves open the possibility that reality may be fundamentally mental or spiritual in nature, even if it cannot be fully expressed or understood through language
Despite these criticisms, Russell’s refutation of idealism remains an influential and important contribution to the debate between realism and idealism in philosophy. His emphasis on logical atomism, the theory of descriptions, and the existence of unperceived objects has had a lasting impact on the development of analytic philosophy and the study of language, logic, and metaphysics.
IV. Early Wittgenstein’s Refutation of Idealism
1. The Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
- Ludwig Wittgenstein was an Austrian-British philosopher who made significant contributions to the philosophy of language, logic, and metaphysics
- His early work, the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, was published in 1921 and is considered one of the most important philosophical texts of the 20th century
- The Tractatus presents a series of interconnected propositions that aim to provide a comprehensive account of the relationship between language, the world, and human thought
- Wittgenstein’s early philosophy is often seen as a refutation of idealism, as it emphasizes the importance of logical analysis and the limits of metaphysical speculation
2. The Picture Theory of Language
- One of the central ideas in the Tractatus is the Picture Theory of Language, which asserts that language represents the world by mirroring its logical structure
- According to this theory, sentences are meaningful insofar as they can be mapped onto states of affairs in the world
- The Picture Theory of Language is a form of logical atomism, which holds that the world is composed of simple, indivisible elements (atoms) and that language can accurately represent these elements through its logical structure
- Wittgenstein’s Picture Theory of Language is often seen as a rejection of idealism, as it emphasizes the objective, mind-independent nature of the world and the capacity of language to represent it accurately
3. The Limits of Language and Metaphysics
- Another key theme in the Tractatus is the idea that there are limits to what can be meaningfully said or thought about the world
- Wittgenstein famously claimed that “what can be said at all can be said clearly, and what we cannot talk about we must pass over in silence”
- This view implies that many traditional metaphysical questions, such as those concerning the nature of reality, the self, and the divine, are ultimately nonsensical or inexpressible
- Wittgenstein’s emphasis on the limits of language and metaphysics can be seen as a refutation of idealism, as it challenges the idea that reality is fundamentally mental or spiritual in nature and that it can be fully grasped through philosophical speculation
4. Criticisms of Early Wittgenstein’s Refutation
- Some critics argue that Wittgenstein’s early philosophy is too restrictive, as it denies the possibility of meaningful discourse about many important philosophical topics
- Others claim that the Picture Theory of Language is overly simplistic, as it fails to account for the complexity and diversity of human language and thought
- Additionally, some philosophers argue that Wittgenstein’s emphasis on the limits of language and metaphysics does not necessarily refute idealism, as it leaves open the possibility that reality may be fundamentally mental or spiritual in nature, even if it cannot be fully expressed or understood through language
Despite these criticisms, Wittgenstein’s early philosophy remains an influential and important contribution to the debate between realism and idealism in philosophy. His emphasis on logical analysis, the Picture Theory of Language, and the limits of language and metaphysics has had a lasting impact on the development of analytic philosophy and the study of language, logic, and metaphysics.
V. Comparing Moore, Russell, and Early Wittgenstein’s Refutations
1. Similarities and Differences in Their Approaches
- All three philosophers, Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein, were part of the analytic philosophy movement and aimed to refute idealism
- Similarities:
- Emphasis on the importance of language and logic in understanding the world
- Rejection of the idea that reality is fundamentally mental or spiritual in nature
- Defence of commonsense realism, asserting the existence of an external world independent of our perceptions
- Differences:
- Moore focused on the distinction between sense-data and external objects, using direct experience and common sense to prove the existence of the external world
- Russell employed logical atomism and the theory of descriptions to argue for the existence of unperceived objects
- Early Wittgenstein developed the picture theory of language in his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, emphasizing the limits of language and metaphysics
2. The Role of Language and Logic
- Language and logic played a crucial role in the refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein
- They believed that a clear and precise understanding of language and logical analysis could help reveal the true nature of reality
- For Moore, the distinction between sense-data and external objects was essential for understanding the relationship between our perceptions and the external world
- Russell’s logical atomism and theory of descriptions aimed to provide a rigorous logical framework for understanding the existence of unperceived objects
- Early Wittgenstein’s picture theory of language emphasized the correspondence between language, thought, and reality, as well as the limits of what can be meaningfully expressed
3. The Impact on Later Analytic Philosophy
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein had a significant impact on the development of later analytic philosophy
- Their emphasis on language, logic, and commonsense realism influenced subsequent philosophical movements, such as logical positivism and ordinary language philosophy
- Their rejection of idealism and metaphysical speculation helped shape the analytic tradition’s focus on clarity, precision, and logical analysis
- The works of these philosophers continue to be studied and debated, as their arguments and insights remain relevant to contemporary philosophical discussions on realism, idealism, and the nature of reality
VI. The Persistence of Idealism
1. The Resilience of Idealism in the Face of Critiques
- Despite the refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein, idealism has persisted as a significant philosophical position
- The resilience of idealism can be attributed to several factors:
- The development of new forms of idealism that address the criticisms raised by Moore, Russell, and Wittgenstein
- The influence of other philosophical traditions, such as phenomenology and existentialism, which have incorporated elements of idealism into their frameworks
- The ongoing debate between realists and idealists, which has led to the refinement and elaboration of both positions
2. The Influence of Idealism on Contemporary Philosophy
- Idealism continues to have an impact on contemporary philosophy, both directly and indirectly
- Some contemporary philosophers have developed new forms of idealism that build on the insights of earlier thinkers while addressing the criticisms raised by Moore, Russell, and Wittgenstein
- For example, objective idealism posits that there is a mind-independent reality, but that this reality is fundamentally mental or spiritual in nature
- Other contemporary philosophers have incorporated elements of idealism into their work, even if they do not explicitly endorse idealism as a whole
- For instance, some philosophers working in the fields of phenomenology, existentialism, and postmodernism have adopted aspects of idealism, such as the emphasis on the role of consciousness and the subjective nature of experience
- Additionally, the persistence of idealism has contributed to the ongoing debate between realists and idealists, which has led to the development of new philosophical positions and arguments on both sides of the debate
VII. The Legacy of Moore, Russell, and Early Wittgenstein
1. The Development of Analytic Philosophy
- Analytic philosophy is a philosophical tradition that emphasizes clarity, precision, and logical analysis in the pursuit of philosophical inquiry
- The works of Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein played a crucial role in the development of analytic philosophy
- Their refutations of idealism and defense of commonsense realism helped shape the movement’s focus on language, logic, and the external world
- Their emphasis on rigorous argumentation and the importance of clear and precise language influenced subsequent generations of analytic philosophers
- The development of analytic philosophy can be seen as a response to the perceived obscurity and metaphysical speculation of earlier philosophical traditions, such as idealism and German idealism
- Analytic philosophy has since evolved and diversified, giving rise to various subfields and movements, such as logical positivism, ordinary language philosophy, and contemporary analytic metaphysics
2. The Influence on Later Philosophers
- The works of Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein have had a lasting impact on the field of philosophy, influencing many later philosophers and shaping the development of various philosophical movements
- Some notable philosophers who were influenced by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein include:
- Rudolf Carnap and A.J. Ayer, who were key figures in the logical positivism movement, which sought to apply the methods of logic and empirical science to philosophical inquiry
- J.L. Austin and P.F. Strawson, who were prominent in the ordinary language philosophy movement, which emphasized the importance of everyday language in understanding philosophical problems
- Willard Van Orman Quine, who challenged the distinction between analytic and synthetic statements and developed a naturalized epistemology that sought to ground philosophical inquiry in empirical science
- Donald Davidson, who developed a theory of meaning based on the concept of truth and made significant contributions to the philosophy of mind, action, and language
- The influence of Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein can also be seen in the ongoing debates between realists and idealists, as well as in contemporary discussions on the nature of language, logic, and metaphysics
VIII. The Impact of Their Refutations on Epistemology
1. The Shift from Idealism to Realism
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein contributed to a significant shift in the field of epistemology, moving from idealism to realism
- This shift was characterized by a greater emphasis on the existence of an external world independent of our perceptions and thoughts
- The rejection of idealism led to the development of new epistemological theories and approaches that focused on the relationship between perception, knowledge, and the external world
- Realism in epistemology asserts that there is a mind-independent reality that can be known through our senses and rational faculties
2. The Role of Perception and Knowledge
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein had a profound impact on the understanding of perception and knowledge in epistemology
- Their works emphasized the importance of distinguishing between sense-data (the immediate objects of perception) and external objects (the mind-independent entities that exist in the world)
- They argued that our knowledge of the external world is grounded in our direct experiences and perceptions, which provide evidence for the existence of mind-independent objects
- This emphasis on the role of perception and knowledge in understanding the external world helped to shape the development of later epistemological theories, such as direct realism, representationalism, and phenomenalism
- Additionally, their focus on the importance of language and logic in understanding the world contributed to the development of new approaches to epistemology, such as logical positivism and ordinary language philosophy
IX. The Impact of Their Refutations on Metaphysics
1. The Rejection of Metaphysical Idealism
- Metaphysical idealism is the philosophical view that reality is fundamentally mental or spiritual in nature
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein contributed to a significant shift in metaphysics, moving away from metaphysical idealism
- Their works emphasized the existence of an external world independent of our perceptions and thoughts, challenging the core tenets of idealism
- The rejection of metaphysical idealism led to the development of new metaphysical theories and approaches that focused on the mind-independent nature of reality, such as physicalism, realism, and naturalism
2. The Emphasis on Logical Analysis
- Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein placed a strong emphasis on logical analysis in their refutations of idealism
- They believed that a clear and precise understanding of language and logical analysis could help reveal the true nature of reality and resolve metaphysical disputes
- This emphasis on logical analysis contributed to the development of new approaches to metaphysics, such as logical atomism (championed by Russell) and the picture theory of language (developed by early Wittgenstein)
- The focus on logical analysis also influenced later developments in analytic philosophy, including the rise of logical positivism and ordinary language philosophy, which sought to apply the methods of logic and empirical science to metaphysical inquiry
X. The Impact of Their Refutations on Philosophy of Language
1. The Importance of Clarity and Precision
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein had a significant impact on the philosophy of language, emphasizing the importance of clarity and precision in philosophical discourse
- Their works contributed to the development of analytic philosophy, a tradition that prioritizes logical analysis and clear, precise language in the pursuit of philosophical inquiry
- By focusing on the role of language and logic in understanding the world, these philosophers helped to establish the philosophy of language as a distinct and important area of study
- Their emphasis on clarity and precision has influenced subsequent generations of philosophers, who have sought to develop rigorous and well-defined theories of meaning, reference, and truth
2. The Rejection of Metaphysical Language
- Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein’s refutations of idealism also led to a rejection of metaphysical language in the philosophy of language
- Metaphysical language refers to the use of abstract, often obscure terms and concepts to describe the nature of reality, the self, and other philosophical topics
- These philosophers argued that many traditional metaphysical questions were ultimately nonsensical or inexpressible, as they relied on unclear or ill-defined language
- This rejection of metaphysical language contributed to the development of new approaches to the philosophy of language, such as logical positivism and ordinary language philosophy, which sought to ground philosophical inquiry in clear, precise, and empirically verifiable language
XI. The Impact of Their Refutations on Philosophy of Mind
1. The Mind-Body Problem
- The mind-body problem is a central issue in the philosophy of mind, concerning the relationship between the mental and the physical
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein had a significant impact on the development of the philosophy of mind, particularly in relation to the mind-body problem
- By rejecting idealism and defending commonsense realism, these philosophers shifted the focus of the mind-body problem from the primacy of the mental to the interaction between the mental and the physical
- This shift led to the development of new theories and approaches to the mind-body problem, such as dualism, materialism, and functionalism
2. The Rejection of Mentalism
- Mentalism is the view that mental states, processes, or events are the primary or most fundamental aspects of reality
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein contributed to the rejection of mentalism in the philosophy of mind
- By emphasizing the existence of an external world independent of our perceptions and thoughts, these philosophers challenged the idea that reality is fundamentally mental in nature
- The rejection of mentalism led to the development of new approaches to the philosophy of mind that focused on the relationship between mental states and physical processes, such as identity theory, functionalism, and eliminative materialism
XII. The Impact of Their Refutations on Ethics
1. The Rejection of Ethical Idealism
- Ethical idealism is a philosophical view that emphasizes the primacy of mental or spiritual aspects in understanding and evaluating moral values and actions
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein contributed to a shift in ethical thought, moving away from ethical idealism
- Their works emphasized the importance of logical analysis and the existence of an external world independent of our perceptions and thoughts, which challenged the core tenets of ethical idealism
- The rejection of ethical idealism led to the development of new ethical theories and approaches that focused on the relationship between moral values and the objective, mind-independent nature of reality
2. The Emphasis on Moral Realism
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein contributed to the development of moral realism, an ethical theory that asserts the existence of objective moral values and facts
- Moral realism is characterized by the belief that moral values and facts exist independently of our beliefs, attitudes, and feelings
- This emphasis on moral realism contrasts with ethical idealism, which posits that moral values and facts are fundamentally mental or spiritual in nature
- The development of moral realism has led to various subfields and debates within ethics, such as the nature of moral properties, the relationship between moral facts and natural facts, and the role of moral intuition in ethical reasoning
XIII. The Impact of Their Refutations on Aesthetics
1. The Rejection of Aesthetic Idealism
- Aesthetic idealism is a philosophical view that emphasizes the mental or spiritual nature of aesthetic experience and artistic creation
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein had an impact on aesthetics, leading to a rejection of aesthetic idealism
- By defending commonsense realism and emphasizing the existence of an external world independent of our perceptions and thoughts, these philosophers challenged the idea that aesthetic experience is fundamentally mental or spiritual in nature
- The rejection of aesthetic idealism led to the development of new approaches to aesthetics that focused on the relationship between art, the external world, and human perception, such as formalism, expressionism, and aesthetic cognitivism
2. The Emphasis on Aesthetic Realism
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein also contributed to an emphasis on aesthetic realism in the philosophy of art
- Aesthetic realism is the view that aesthetic properties, such as beauty and ugliness, are objective features of the world that can be discovered and appreciated through human perception and understanding
- This emphasis on aesthetic realism contrasts with aesthetic idealism, which holds that aesthetic properties are subjective or mind-dependent features of reality
- The focus on aesthetic realism has influenced subsequent developments in aesthetics, such as the exploration of the nature of aesthetic properties, the role of perception in aesthetic experience, and the relationship between art and the external world
XIV. The Impact of Their Refutations on Political Philosophy
1. The Rejection of Political Idealism
- Political idealism is a philosophical view that emphasizes the primacy of mental or spiritual aspects in understanding and evaluating political systems, values, and actions
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein contributed to a shift in political thought, moving away from political idealism
- By defending commonsense realism and emphasizing the existence of an external world independent of our perceptions and thoughts, these philosophers challenged the core tenets of political idealism
- The rejection of political idealism led to the development of new approaches to political philosophy that focused on the relationship between political values and the objective, mind-independent nature of reality
2. The Emphasis on Political Realism
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein also contributed to an emphasis on political realism in the philosophy of politics
- Political realism is the view that political values, systems, and actions are grounded in objective facts about the world and human nature, rather than being solely determined by subjective beliefs or ideals
- This emphasis on political realism contrasts with political idealism, which holds that political values and systems are primarily shaped by subjective or mental factors
- The focus on political realism has influenced subsequent developments in political philosophy, such as the exploration of the nature of political power, the role of human nature in shaping political systems, and the relationship between political values and the external world
XV. The Impact of Their Refutations on Philosophy of Religion
1. The Rejection of Religious Idealism
- Religious idealism is a philosophical view that emphasizes the mental or spiritual nature of religious experience and the divine
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein had an impact on the philosophy of religion, leading to a rejection of religious idealism
- By defending commonsense realism and emphasizing the existence of an external world independent of our perceptions and thoughts, these philosophers challenged the idea that religious experience and the divine are fundamentally mental or spiritual in nature
- The rejection of religious idealism led to the development of new approaches to the philosophy of religion that focused on the relationship between religious beliefs, the external world, and human perception, such as religious naturalism, religious pluralism, and skeptical theism
2. The Emphasis on Religious Realism
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein also contributed to an emphasis on religious realism in the philosophy of religion
- Religious realism is the view that religious truths and divine properties are objective features of the world that can be discovered and appreciated through human perception and understanding
- This emphasis on religious realism contrasts with religious idealism, which holds that religious truths and divine properties are subjective or mind-dependent features of reality
- The focus on religious realism has influenced subsequent developments in the philosophy of religion, such as the exploration of the nature of religious experience, the relationship between faith and reason, and the problem of religious diversity
XVI. Conclusion
1. The Enduring Significance of Moore, Russell, and Early Wittgenstein’s Refutations
- The refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein have had a lasting impact on various fields of philosophy, including epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, ethics, aesthetics, and political philosophy
- Their works contributed to the development of analytic philosophy, a tradition that emphasizes clarity, precision, and logical analysis in the pursuit of philosophical inquiry
- The rejection of idealism and the defense of commonsense realism by these philosophers have shaped contemporary debates on the nature of reality, the mind, and the external world
- Their emphasis on the importance of language and logic in understanding the world has influenced subsequent generations of philosophers and the development of various philosophical movements, such as logical positivism and ordinary language philosophy
2. The Continuing Debate Between Idealism and Realism
- Despite the refutations of idealism by Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein, the debate between idealism and realism continues to be a central issue in philosophy
- The persistence of idealism can be attributed to the development of new forms of idealism that address the criticisms raised by these philosophers, as well as the influence of other philosophical traditions that incorporate elements of idealism
- The ongoing debate between realists and idealists has led to the refinement and elaboration of both positions, and the exploration of new theories and approaches in various fields of philosophy
- The enduring significance of Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein’s refutations highlights the importance of their contributions to the history of philosophy and the continuing relevance of their ideas to contemporary philosophical debates
- Analyze the role of sense-data in Moore’s refutation of idealism and discuss its implications for our understanding of perception and the external world. (250 words)
- Compare and contrast Russell’s logical atomism and Wittgenstein’s picture theory of language in their respective refutations of idealism. How do these theories contribute to the development of analytic philosophy? (250 words)
- Discuss the impact of Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein’s refutations of idealism on the philosophy of mind. How do their arguments challenge the assumptions of mentalism and contribute to the development of new approaches to the mind-body problem? (250 words)
- Compare the influence of Moore, Russell, and early Wittgenstein’s refutations of idealism on the development of ethics and political philosophy. How do their arguments contribute to the shift from idealism to realism in these fields? (250 words)
- Examine the relationship between early Wittgenstein’s refutation of idealism and the philosophy of religion. How does his emphasis on the limits of language and metaphysics challenge traditional religious idealism and contribute to the development of religious realism? (250 words)
Responses