Sputnik-like Effect of China’s Missile Test

From Current Affairs Notes for UPSC » Editorials & In-depths » This topic

IAS EXPRESS Vs UPSC Prelims 2024: 80+ questions reflected

What missile did China test?

  • In October, China tested a nuclear-capable hypersonic glide vehicle according to a report in London-based Financial Times.
  • The term ‘hypersonic’ refers to speeds that are 5 or more times faster than the speed of sound.
  • The vehicle has a ‘fractional orbital bombardment’ system, which enables it to hit a target by entering in lower orbit.
  • This vehicle flew in the low-orbit space to circle the earth before cruising down to strike its target.
  • The missile missed the target by several miles.

What does Sputnik-like effect mean?

  • Sputnik was a satellite launched by the Soviet Union in 1957.
  • It is considered as a sign of technological superiority of the erstwhile Soviet Union.
  • It is also considered as a symbol of American weakness. This is because the test caught the US intelligence unaware.
  • The shock drove the US administration, headed by Eisenhower, to set on a ballistic missile race.
  • This race led to the 2 superpowers to the brink of a disastrous war- especially during the Cuban missile crisis.
  • In late October, General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the USA, commented on the recent Chinese missile test: “I don’t know if it’s quite a Sputnik moment, but I think it’s very close to that. It has all our attention.”
  • The test could trigger a similar race among nuclear-armed countries to modernize their arsenal and add new nuclear capabilities to their arsenal.

Prelims Sureshots – Most Probable Topics for UPSC Prelims

A Compilation of the Most Probable Topics for UPSC Prelims, including Schemes, Freedom Fighters, Judgments, Acts, National Parks, Government Agencies, Space Missions, and more. Get a guaranteed 120+ marks!

Why is China’s missile test significant?

  • Missile defence undermines ‘strategic stability’- the foundation of the prolonged peace during the Cold War.
  • The term strategic stability means that there is a mutual vulnerability i.e. a nuclear-armed state is unable to launch the first strike, as it would leave it vulnerable to a retaliatory strike from its adversary.
  • However, a robust Ballistic Missile Defence compromises the adversary’s ability to launch a retaliatory strike. The BMD does this by neutralizing the incoming missile.
  • USA’s Ballistic Missile Defence program is viewed as a threat to the deterrence capacity of Russia and China. Hence, the 2 countries have been investing in new technologies- especially, hypersonic weapons systems- that can evade the missile defence system.
  • The recent Chinese test can be seen as an insurance against a first strike from the USA.
  • The ‘fractional orbital bombardment’ system enables China to target USA via South Pole. This is significant as USA has very few early warning systems in this region.
  • The HGVs could escape detection by early warning systems as they fly at lower altitudes than ballistic missile and are aided by the earth’s curvature.
  • Hence, their stealth and manoeuvrability, and not their speed, are the key reasons for their destabilizing nature.

How do such technologies impact strategic stability?

  • New technologies, like hypersonic weapons systems, impact strategic stability in 2 ways:
  • Undermine ‘crisis stability’ and incentivize nuclear first-use.
  • Encourage an action-reaction cycle and erode ‘arms-race stability’.

What is the way ahead?

  • Unlike the Sputnik test, the Chinese pursuit of hypersonic technology is not a surprise. This is especially because Russia and China have been wary of USA’s BMD program- after the American giant’s withdrawal from the 2002 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.
  • Missile-based defence is inherently destabilizing.
  • Though the missile test is not analogous to the Sputnik test, it is expected to trigger events similar to those set in motion by the Sputnik.
  • The test is expected to trigger an intense arms race at regional and global level, given the existence of only minimal arms control at present.
  • The USA may start expanding its hypersonic program and modernizing its missile defence systems. Already, it is developing conventional long-range hypersonic missiles.

With regards to India:

  • The Chinese hypersonic weapon systems is not particularly India-focused, but it could push New Delhi to take action:
  • Accelerating its hypersonic missile program.
  • Erecting a robust missile defense system.
  • Given, India is already developing a dual-capable hypersonic cruise missile and an anti-ship hypersonic missile, there is a regional arms race on the horizon.
  • This is not particularly encouraging for the regional peace either.

Conclusion:

Though the recent Chinese test didn’t come with a Sputnik-like surprise, it has the potential to trigger a post-Sputnik-like arms race. This doesn’t bode well for strategic stability- regionally and globally.

If you like this post, please share your feedback in the comments section below so that we will upload more posts like this.

Related Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
X
Home Courses Plans Account