“The concept of just and unjust is contextual. What was just a year back, may turn out to be unjust in today’s context. Changing context should be constantly under scrutiny to prevent miscarriage of justice.” Examine the above statement with suitable examples. (150 words)

The idea of justice is dynamic, evolving with societal changes. What was deemed just earlier may become unjust today due to shifting norms, values, or circumstances.

Examining the Statement:

Evolving Social Norms: Practices like “Triple Talaq” were once accepted in India but later deemed unjust, leading to its criminalization in 2019 to protect women’s rights.
Technological Advancements: Data privacy laws have evolved as technology advanced. While data sharing was once common, it’s now considered unjust without consent, prompting stricter regulations like the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.
Environmental Concerns: Industrial practices seen as progressive in the past are now unjust due to environmental damage. The Paris Agreement urges sustainable development to ensure climate justice.
Gender Equality: Child marriage, once socially accepted, is now considered a violation of rights, reflecting changing perceptions of justice.

Conclusion: Justice requires continual reassessment in line with evolving contexts, ensuring fairness, equality, and protection of rights.