The growth of cabinet system has practically resulted in the marginalisation of the parliamentary supremacy" Elucidate. (150 words)

The Cabinet system in India, a legacy of the British parliamentary model, has evolved to concentrate power in the hands of a few ministers. This shift has gradually marginalized the concept of parliamentary supremacy, affecting democratic accountability.

Marginalisation of Parliamentary Supremacy Due to Cabinet System:

Centralization of Power: The Prime Minister and Cabinet possess significant authority, making decisions without adequate parliamentary input, leading to reduced parliamentary oversight.
Ordinance Route: Increasing use of ordinances bypasses Parliament, exemplified by the 76 ordinances passed between 2015-2023, undermining the legislative role.
Party Whip System: The rigid enforcement of party whips often suppresses independent opinions of MPs, making Parliament a mere rubber stamp for Cabinet decisions.
Limited Time for Debates: Crucial bills, like the 2020 Farm Laws, were passed without comprehensive debate, indicating diminishing parliamentary scrutiny.
Executive Dominance: The Cabinet often controls parliamentary committees, weakening their role in scrutinizing government policies effectively.

Conclusion:
For genuine parliamentary supremacy, India must strengthen institutional checks on the Cabinet’s powers, ensuring enhanced accountability and transparency in decision-making.