Which of the following statements about the Ethics Committee in the Lok Sabha are correct?
- Initially it was an ad-hoc Committee.
- Only a Member of the Lok Sabha can make a complaint relating to unethical conduct of a member of the Lok Sabha.
- This Committee cannot take up any matter which is sub-judice.
Select the answer using the code given below:
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 2 and 3 only
(c) 1 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3
Correct Answer: (c) 1 and 3 only
Explanation
- Statement 1: Initially, it was an ad-hoc Committee.
- Statement 2: Only a Member of the Lok Sabha can make a complaint relating to unethical conduct of a member of the Lok Sabha.
- Statement 3: This Committee cannot take up any matter which is sub-judice.
Learn more
Lok Sabha’s Ethics Committee
- Constitution and History:
- The idea of ethics panels for the two Houses was first mooted at a Presiding Officers’ Conference held in Delhi in 1996.
- The Rajya Sabha constituted its Ethics Committee on March 4, 1997, inaugurated in May 1997.
- In the Lok Sabha, a study group of the House Committee of Privileges recommended the constitution of an Ethics Committee in 1997, but it was not taken up until the 13th Lok Sabha.
- The late Speaker G M C Balayogi constituted an ad-hoc Ethics Committee in 2000, which became a permanent part of the House in 2015.
- Functions:
- Procedure for Complaints:
- Any person can complain against a Member through another Lok Sabha MP, along with evidence of the alleged misconduct and an affidavit stating that the complaint is not “false, frivolous, or vexatious”.
- The Speaker can refer any complaint against an MP to the Committee.
- The Committee does not entertain complaints based only on media reports or on matters that are sub-judice.
- The Committee makes a prima facie inquiry before deciding to examine a complaint and makes its recommendations after evaluating the complaint.
- Potential Outcomes:
- If the Ethics Committee finds merit in the complaint, it can recommend punishments such as suspension of the MP for a specified period.
- The House, which includes all MPs, will ultimately decide whether to accept the committee’s recommendation and determine the nature and extent of the punishment, if any.
- If the accused were to be expelled or face a potentially adverse decision, they could challenge it in a court of law on limited grounds such as unconstitutionality, gross illegality, or denial of natural justice.
- Notable Cases:
Reflection in IAS EXPRESS
[collapse]