Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021

Santhosh Kumar 20/12/2023
0 Comments
Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 comprehensive mind map When Passed by Parliament in August 2021 Replaced the Tribunals Reforms Ordinance, 2021 Why Rationalization and streamlining tribunal functions Shift functions to existing judicial bodies Reduce the burden on specialized tribunals What Abolishment of Certain Tribunals Film Certification Appellate Tribunal Airports Appellate Tribunal, etc. Transfer of Functions To High Courts and other judicial bodies Search-cum-Selection Committee Composition Chief Justice of India or Supreme Court Judge as Chairperson Two Central Government-nominated Secretaries Sitting/Outgoing Tribunal Chairperson or Retired Judge Secretary of the Union Ministry (non-voting) Function Recommend appointments for tribunals Tenure Provisions Four-year tenure Chairperson minimum age 50 Member tenure till 67 years Chairperson tenure till 70 years Amendments to Other Acts Finance Act, 2017 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Where Across India Who Indian Parliament Various Judicial and Quasi-judicial Bodies How Legislative Process Introduction and Passing in Parliament Pros Reduces excessive tribunalization Restores jurisdiction to actual courts Increases accessibility to justice Addresses non-functionality of some tribunals Cons Hasty passage without adequate discussion Re-enactment of provisions previously struck down Violates principle of separation of powers Shifting of domain-specific cases to general courts Increase in burden on High Courts Expertise in tribunals overstated Lost opportunity for meaningful reform Way Forward Implementing true reforms Expanding district judiciary and High Courts Establishing autonomous appointment mechanisms Supervising tribunals by High Courts Considering an All India Tribunal Service

Summary: The Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021, represents an attempt to streamline the tribunal system in India by abolishing certain tribunals and transferring their functions to existing judicial bodies. While it aims to reduce the burden on specialized tribunals and increase accessibility to justice, the Act has faced criticism for its hasty passage, potential violation of the principle of separation of powers, and for reintroducing provisions previously struck down by the Supreme Court. The way forward includes implementing true reforms, expanding the judiciary, and establishing autonomous mechanisms for appointments and oversight.

If you like this post, please share your feedback in the comments section below so that we will upload more posts like this.

Related Posts

Categories: Judiciary/Justice
Tags: ,
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Report

Harassment or bullying behavior
Contains mature or sensitive content
Contains misleading or false information
Contains abusive or derogatory content
Contains spam, fake content or potential malware

Block Member?

Please confirm you want to block this member.

You will no longer be able to:

  • See blocked member's posts
  • Mention this member in posts

Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.

Report

You have already reported this .
X
Home Courses Plans Account